● Numji Astrology Module Validation Report

Professional-Precision Progressed Chart Calculation

Numji's secondary progression calculation infrastructure was compared against astronomical references and independent geometric controls across 250 test cases generated from various dates, times, geographical locations, and target years. A total of 33,757 results were examined for the natal baseline, progressed planets, and Progressed–Natal aspects.

Validation Completed · Failed: 0
250Distinct test cases
33,757Separate comparisons
3Boundary case reviews
0Failed results
✓
The numerical foundation of the progressed chart has been validated
Natal and progressed planet positions, motion directions, natal houses, natal house placements of progressed planets, Progressed–Natal aspects, and orb values passed the established acceptance criteria. Three results were separately reviewed as they were extremely close to the natural orb threshold; no failed results were found.

Validated Progressed Chart calculations

The primary result groups forming the temporal, astronomical, and geometric foundation of the secondary progression technique.

SECONDARY PROGRESSION TIME

The time conversion where one tropical year corresponds to one ephemeris day was independently checked at the level of target age and progressed UTC moment.

NATAL AND PROGRESSED PLANETS

Natal and progressed planetary longitudes alongside direct/retrograde motion directions were compared with reference values.

NATAL HOUSES AND PLACEMENTS

Natal ASC–MC, the twelve natal house cusps, and the placements of progressed planets in natal houses were checked.

PROGRESSED–NATAL ASPECTS

Aspect types, true angles, orb values, and applying–separating statuses were validated through independent geometric calculation.

Validation results

Numerical distribution of the tested calculation groups. Boundary cases were evaluated separately and are not classified as failures.

Calculation GroupComparisonCompatibleBoundary ReviewResult
Time conversion7507500Passed
Natal axes: ASC and MC5005000Passed
Natal house cusps3,0003,0000Passed
Natal planet positions and motion directions6,5006,5000Passed
Progressed planet positions and motion directions6,5006,5000Passed
Natal house placements of progressed planets3,2503,2500Passed
Progressed–Natal aspect type, true angle, and orb9,7539,7530Passed
Applying–separating status3,2513,2510Passed
Orb boundary membership checks303Reviewed
Independent repeat check2502500Passed
Total33,75733,7543Passed

Highlighted precision results

Summary of average and maximum differences observed in the test set.

MeasurementAverage DifferenceMaximum DifferenceEvaluationResult
Progressed planet positions0.000599°0.013688°Within acceptance criteriaPassed
Natal planet positions0.000590°0.014775°Within acceptance criteriaPassed
Natal axes and house cusps0.002318°0.015568°Within acceptance criteriaPassed
Progressed–Natal aspect orbs0.000846°0.014872°Within acceptance criteriaPassed
Chiron positions0.00000345°0.00110303°500/500 compatiblePassed
Moon positions—0.013688°500/500 compatiblePassed
Lunar nodes—0.000321°1,000/1,000 compatiblePassed

Why do boundary cases occur?

When an astronomical value is extremely close to a classification line, very small numerical differences can produce different membership tags.

ORB THRESHOLD

Three aspects were located right next to the orb boundary used. A very minor geometric difference affected whether the aspect was classified as inside or outside the boundary.

NUMERICAL FOUNDATION COMPATIBLE

In these three cases, planetary longitudes and true angle values were within acceptance criteria. The separate review pertains solely to the boundary aspect membership label.

Test methodology

The goal was to ensure the results rely on wide time, location, and calculation diversity rather than a single chart.

SCOPE

  • 250 distinct test cases
  • Target dates between 1900–2100
  • A wide range of birth dates, times, and locations
  • Total of 33,757 comparisons

INDEPENDENT CONTROLS

  • Comparison with astronomical reference data
  • Independent generation of secondary progression time
  • Recalculation of aspect and orb geometry
  • Applying–separating and repeat consistency check

SPECIAL POINTS

  • Moon, Chiron, North Lunar Node, and South Lunar Node were additionally tracked. All position and motion direction results for these points remained within acceptance criteria.

INDEPENDENT CALCULATION

Reference sources were used strictly for comparison purposes. Numji's production calculations are executed within its own calculation infrastructure independently of the validation tool.

What does this result mean for the astrologer?

The time conversion, planetary degrees, natal house placements, and aspects formed with the natal chart upon which Progressed Chart interpretation relies are delivered with a calculation infrastructure backed by an extensive numerical validation set. This allows astrologers to focus on holistically evaluating the symbolic developmental themes of the progressed chart rather than technical computations.